The confrontation of proxy titans is nearing the end. Oxylabs and Bright Data have constantly struggled to earn a place in the sun. These are the largest and probably the most advanced proxy providers today that have won general recognition among users. Which one is the overall better provider? Making a final stand here, Oxylabs and Bright Data put things right.
Oxylabs vs. Bright Data: Comparative Overview
Being launched around the same time, Oxylabs and Bright Data (former Luminati) provide relatively equal quality services. Each of the companies offers a substantially large pool of proxy IPs. According to stats, Oxylabs resolutely leads the pack in terms of IP quantity having exceeded 102 million IP addresses. Regarding its adversary, Bright Data gives up ground with a pool of 72 million IP addresses. The number of services offered by the competitors also diverges. Oxylabs has steadily excelled over its rival in the range of proxy features.
Irrespective of differences, these companies do have similarities. They support two essential protocols – HTTPS and SOCKS – and provide an advanced geo-targeting option splitting it into three major levels – country, state, and city. Another similarity not to leave out of account is that both companies offer their residential proxies with limited bandwidth. All of the providers obtain their IPs via Peer-to-Peer networks and rotate them for their users. These providers constantly rival for the first place in their niche. Bright Data has positioned itself as the market leader while Oxylabs contends this title fairly well. Over the past few years, the company did a good job in the enhancement of its performance and charged ahead.
Oxylabs
Bright Data
Foundation Date
2015
2014
Types of Proxies
Residential ProxiesDatacenter Proxies Mobile Proxies ISP proxies
Residential Proxies Datacenter Proxies Mobile Proxies ISP Proxies
IP Pool
102M+
72M+
Protocols
HTTPSSOCKS
HTTPSSOCKS
Min package price
$300 per month
$500 per month
Geo-targeting options
CountryState City
CountryState City
Types of Proxies & Their Features
Type
Oxylabs
Bright Data
Residential
Static New Gen
Static
Datacenter
Dedicated Shared
Dedicated Shared
ISP
Dedicated Rotating
ISP
Mobile
Rotating
Rotating
SOCKS
+
–
Both providers offer several types of proxy networks. According to the services provided, Oxylabs is more versatile since the choice of proxy features is richer. Bright Data used to dominate in this regard. When its competitor has implemented Mobile and SOCKS proxies, Bright Data has lost its weight. At the moment, Oxylabs shows better efficiency with different proxy types for all use cases.
The thing these two can glory in is the best IP rotation system in the rotating residential market. They support high-rotating proxies that change IP every request. This feature makes them a practical solution for web scraping and data collection. Besides, these platforms support sticky sessions that maintain an IP address for a specified interval before changing it. Currently, users can maintain the session on both services for up to 30 minutes.
Summary: Multifarious proxy features provided by Oxylabs bring the platform. 1/0 for Oxylabs.
Other Tools
To make the user experience even more comfortable, the opponents have involved some additional tools. For example, Bright Data has implemented the Proxy Manager option that allows managing all proxies using one interface. Among the tools for data collection, the company has designed Datasets as a cost-effective way to collect information without obstacles. Data Collector is another tool for extracting information at scale with zero infrastructure. Search Engine Collector is a crawler that allows getting real user search results for any keyword. Oxylabs specializes in scraping activity providing tools for e-commerce, web, and SERP scraping. Anyhow, it is still a technical tool that requires some programming experience. Here, Bright Data is more convenient in usage due to the high customizability of its features. Both providers offer browser extensions but Oxylabs looks to win against its competitor’s background for its extension working with any proxy.
Summary: Thanks to the ease of use, Bright Data gets a well-deserved score. 1/1 – the score is evened.
Cases of Use
Each provider comprises various use cases. Compare Oxylabs vs Bright Data in terms of application field:
Oxylabs
Bright Data
Market Research
Brand Protection
Travel Fare Aggregation
Ad Verification
SEO Monitoring
Price Monitoring
Email Protection
Review Monitoring
Cybersecurity
Alternative Information
Threat Intelligence
Food Delivery Information
Website Change monitoring
Social Media for Marketing
Travel
Search Engine Results Crawling
Request a Custom Solution
Ad Tech
SEO Monitoring
Website Testing
E-commerce
Market Research
Financial Use Cases
According to the use cases covered by these platforms, both companies have a diverse sphere of applications. Anyhow, Oxylabs is a better choice for web scraping while Bright Data suits more for data collection due to the nature of the tools.
Summary: The range of options covered by Oxylabs is richer and more diverse. 2/1 for Oxylabs.
Performance
Choosing a proxy to adhere to, users rely on multiple performance indicators such as speed, stability, success rate, and reliability. Let’s see how these platforms stand in terms of performance.
Oxylabs
Bright Data
Success rate
87%
99%
Speed
0.98 secs
1.2 secs
Server stability
97.72%
97.12%
According to the stats, Bright Data is the first-rate provider considering the success rate that hits the highest point here. When testing the service, almost all of the requests sent via the provider were successful. Having sent hundreds of requests within a second, we have not noticed any malfunctions of the server that impact the performance in any way. Bright Data can be truly proud of its uptime which is around 99%. As for the response time, it is also impressive but a little inferior to Oxylabs.
The success rate shown by Oxylabs was not so unblemished. That’s not to say the platform is a precarious service to steer away but its success rate leaves much to be desired. Another issue worth paying attention to is that the sizable number of the IPs offered by Oxylabs are IPv6n which might not be what the majority of users look for.
Summary: Bright Data has proved itself as a reliable and smoothly operating service that can boast a strong performance. Despite all the efforts, Oxylabs needs to work out the kinds. 2/2 – the score is evened again.
User Experience
Oxylabs
Bright Data
24/7 support
+
+
Live chat
+
+
Response time
Up to 3 minutes
Up to 30 minutes
Supported languages
English, Chinese
English, German, French, Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese, Japan
These companies have already gained confidence concerning user experience. They have done a great job elaborating documentation for all occasions. Quick start guides are cognitively simple for newcomers. Here, you can read some blog articles, listen to various helpful podcasts, and watch some webinars. In other words, both companies worked hard to cover all essential points to streamline the user experience.
As for customer support, it meets all the standards set for the largest proxy companies. The support team is considerate and mindful but the response time is slightly different. In this aspect, Oxylabs wins due to the fastest response within 3 minutes.
Users have already marked all positive moments in customer support of both companies. The Audience Award goes to Oxylabs rated 4.7 on Trustpilot with 90% of excellent rates. The most praised feature was the quality of customer support – fast, amazing, and helpful. Bright Data does not fall behind and stays afloat with the same rating of 4.7 points.
Summary: Here, we give pride of place to Oxylabs since it has compiled a splendid collection of comprehensible documentation. Its rivals tried to keep up but its support was not so quick. 3/2 for Oxylabs.
Reputation
The newsworthy story about the competitors’ relations occurred in 2018. Bright Data sued Oxylabs claiming its technology infringed Bright Data patents. The judge resolved all allegations in the first case dismissing claims and counterclaims with prejudice. In a while, Bright Data filed additional lawsuits, where Oxylabs states its competitor’s patents were invalid and ineligible for patent protection.
Bright Data’s idea was not to win the case: they endeavored to tie up its rivals in endless legal proceedings. Legal proceedings distract from core business operations and discourage companies from applying their services.
Summary: This story does not do Bright Data any favors. On the contrary, it abates the company’s merits and brings it into disrepute. Here, we should refrain from evaluation. Still 3/2 for Oxylabs.
Pricing
These two are in a constant adversarial relationship that sheds on their pricing.
Oxylabs Pricing Plans:
Starter
Business
Scale-up
Corporate
Enterprise
Residential
$300/mo
$600/mo
$900/mo
$5,000/mo
New Gen Residential
$360/mo
$750/mo
$1,100/mo
$6,000/mo
Static Residential
Contact sales
Dedicated Datacenter
$180/mo
$800/mo
$1,500/mo
$6,000/mo
Shared Datacenter
$100/mo
$200/mo
$300/mo
$500/mo
$1,000/mo
Mobile
$500/mo
$1,100/mo
$2,000/mo
$11,000/mo
Rotating ISP
$340/mo
$700/mo
$1,100/mo
$6,000/mo
SOCKS
Contact sales
Bright Data Pricing Plans:
Starter
Advanced
Advanced +
Enterprise
Residential
$500/mo
$1,000/mo
$2,000/mo
Custom
Datacenter
$500/mo
$1,000/mo
$2,000/mo
Custom
Mobile
$500/mo
$1,000/mo
$2,000/mo
Custom
ISP
$500/mo
$1,000/mo
$2,000/mo
Custom
Oxylabs’ pricing plans are cheaper than its rival’s ones. Seemingly, the company lowballs the cost of its service to spurt into the lead and, we should note, not in vain. Unlike Bright Data, it has a brunched price system that covers all categories of users.
It is worth noting that Bright Data offers a helpful option Pay as You Go that allows you not to buy the whole package but to pay for GB you spent. Besides, both companies have a trial period coupled with a refund policy.
Summary: Despite Bright Data having thought of a Pay as You Go option, its tariffs are too high compared with its competitor. 5/3 for Oxylabs.
Conclusion
Oxylabs is the company that will provide you with multiple features for a comparatively low price but its performance can cripple from time to time. Bright Data does not keep pace in the development of features and options but provides stable and smooth operation. Both providers are worth the money spent but we favor Oxylabs for cutting-edge solutions and features. The result of today’s battle is 5/3 for Oxylabs.
We use cookies on our site to ensure that we give you the best browsing experience. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to this use. For more information on how we use cookies, see our Privacy Policy.
